turre
Cycling Tourist Group
Posts: 1
|
Post by turre on Feb 24, 2007 10:49:46 GMT 1
How is it possible that the race was recalculated? A lot of managers were not able to set new orders! In the new calculations, my team for example didn't compete! It's not that my cyclists were winning the Dauphiné, but now there are 0 points... In my opinion, it would be more fair if the race was simply cancelled. I hope these bugs will be dealth with properly, or the game loses its attraction...
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 24, 2007 11:04:41 GMT 1
maybe an idea for padrino: if a race is wrong: recalculate it the day after?
|
|
|
Post by thenose1 on Feb 24, 2007 11:09:35 GMT 1
If there is a backup after 12.45 that day, you can recalculate immediately, the race orders are correct then.
|
|
jehe
Junior Team
Posts: 23
|
Post by jehe on Feb 24, 2007 11:12:47 GMT 1
Maybe that would be the best idea, make a backup just before the races are calcullated. I don't think that's a problem as it can be scripted.
If there's still something wrong and races has to be recalcullated then, than maybe the next day
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 24, 2007 11:17:13 GMT 1
is an idea.
|
|
|
Post by jgeenens on Feb 24, 2007 13:07:02 GMT 1
Don't worry peepz, the race of today is wrong too.
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Feb 24, 2007 13:08:28 GMT 1
Yes, all mountain sprinters have 20 minutes on the rest of the peloton...
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 24, 2007 13:16:38 GMT 1
maybe this is 'Il Padrino's contribution to the redistribution of the prize money
|
|
|
Post by itgen on Feb 24, 2007 13:23:34 GMT 1
If there is a backup after 12.45 that day, you can recalculate immediately, the race orders are correct then. Since Padrino wasn't home, I guess there wasn't
|
|
|
Post by leemalone on Feb 25, 2007 14:47:03 GMT 1
Another bug:
In the last three stages it happens a lot that the second finishes exactly 5 sec behind the first. I checked some divisions in Belgium and it seems that mine (3.9) is not the only one.
|
|
|
Post by marvin on Feb 25, 2007 15:10:37 GMT 1
Once again I lose a tour because a bug! In Italy 2:3 the winner is an injured cyclist (
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Feb 25, 2007 15:12:37 GMT 1
Another bug: In the last three stages it happens a lot that the second finishes exactly 5 sec behind the first. I checked some divisions in Belgium and it seems that mine (3.9) is not the only one. time bonifications...
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Feb 25, 2007 15:33:21 GMT 1
Another bug: In the last three stages it happens a lot that the second finishes exactly 5 sec behind the first. I checked some divisions in Belgium and it seems that mine (3.9) is not the only one. That's because of the use of old-fashioned analogue stopwatches; everybody knows those in the old days had a scale of 20x 5seconds.
|
|
|
Post by leemalone on Feb 25, 2007 22:36:01 GMT 1
time bonifications... Ah, Ok, must have missed that. Maybe a suggestion for the future about this: only calculate these bonus seconds in the standings and not in the race classification. If I saw a result like this in a real life sprint I would be very surprised: 1. Petacchi 4h32min05sec 2. Boonen 5sec 3. McEwen 10sec ... A hell of a sprint that would be!
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Feb 26, 2007 7:39:39 GMT 1
time bonifications... Ah, Ok, must have missed that. Maybe a suggestion for the future about this: only calculate these bonus seconds in the standings and not in the race classification. If I saw a result like this in a real life sprint I would be very surprised: 1. Petacchi 4h32min05sec 2. Boonen 5sec 3. McEwen 10sec ... A hell of a sprint that would be! That's indeed very unrealistic...! It would be more like : 1. Boonen 4h32min05sec 2. McEwen 5sec 3. Petacchi 10sec ;D ;D
|
|