|
Post by box on Feb 21, 2007 18:46:22 GMT 1
Is a 'random-factor' just beeing introduced or did the new changes to the sprint do this much difference ??
In todays stage
these 2 cyclists of mine competed (together with 2 others). Yet the one expected to triumph this race got blown away, and even finished behind the first cyclist.
With normal sense the 2nd cyclists should have easily defeat the 2nd cyclist yet it didn't happen.
Il padrino could you please elaborate ? I already had the same problem in the Volta a Catalunya....
|
|
|
Post by ando on Feb 21, 2007 18:58:18 GMT 1
You selected the first for sprint/mountain?
|
|
|
Post by box on Feb 21, 2007 19:00:26 GMT 1
The first one is expected to bring home the mounain jersey All my good mountainriders were either in the Giro or are expected to drive the Tour so these are my intermediate cyclists.
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Feb 21, 2007 19:04:58 GMT 1
I think the first one has a high decimal skill for hill. F.E. 3,9 hill seeing there was 46km(=69km) this counts alot
|
|
|
Post by box on Feb 21, 2007 19:17:02 GMT 1
I think the first one has a high decimal skill for hill. F.E. 3,9 hill seeing there was 46km(=69km) this counts alot perhaps .... didn't take that into account but still when you look at the stats you don't expect this to happen. But it seems noone else has these problems....
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 21, 2007 20:38:21 GMT 1
No new random was added, no. How much was their difference in time?
|
|
|
Post by box on Feb 21, 2007 20:47:18 GMT 1
No new random was added, no. How much was their difference in time? 7. Keyngnaert 0 0 +6:04 12. De Kempeneer 0 0 +7:06
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Feb 21, 2007 21:27:36 GMT 1
Strange results for my cyclists too... 14. Dequinnemaere 5:14:04 0 0 Boukichou 20. Vinckx 5:15:28 0 0 Boukichou 26. Brahm 5:16:29 0 0 Boukichou
Sid Dequinnemaere (936) Flat: 4 Downhill: 1 Hill: 2 Sprint: 1 Mountain: 0 Time trial: 1
Jirg Vinckx (1382) Flat: 1 Downhill: 2 Hill: 1 Sprint: 0 Mountain: 2 Time trial: 0
Fuller Brahm (13218) Flat: 1 Downhill: 1 Hill: 0 Sprint: 3 Mountain: 0 Time trial: Fit=100 at the beginning for the three ones, but I put Dequinnemaere at 90% (70% for others). Vinckx for the mountain, Brahm for the sprints, Dequinnemaere for nothing... The difference between Dequinnemaere and the others should higher, nei?
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Feb 21, 2007 22:46:25 GMT 1
Yes I'd guess so.
There are clearly major bugs in the formulas for calculation of results, it's just a matter of waiting for them to be pinpointed and fixed.
I had similar odd results.
|
|
|
Post by gelies on Feb 21, 2007 22:57:50 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 22, 2007 20:27:40 GMT 1
Yes I'd guess so. There are clearly major bugs in the formulas for calculation of results, it's just a matter of waiting for them to be pinpointed and fixed. I had similar odd results. Again yelling 'bug' without knowing that for sure. Not only the primary skills count in the results. How much is their mood? Their recent form? The leadership skill of the team leader? Their current ability (hidden)?
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 22, 2007 20:31:15 GMT 1
Strange results for my cyclists too... 14. Dequinnemaere 5:14:04 0 0 Boukichou 20. Vinckx 5:15:28 0 0 Boukichou 26. Brahm 5:16:29 0 0 Boukichou
Sid Dequinnemaere (936) Flat: 4 Downhill: 1 Hill: 2 Sprint: 1 Mountain: 0 Time trial: 1
Jirg Vinckx (1382) Flat: 1 Downhill: 2 Hill: 1 Sprint: 0 Mountain: 2 Time trial: 0
Fuller Brahm (13218) Flat: 1 Downhill: 1 Hill: 0 Sprint: 3 Mountain: 0 Time trial: Fit=100 at the beginning for the three ones, but I put Dequinnemaere at 90% (70% for others). Vinckx for the mountain, Brahm for the sprints, Dequinnemaere for nothing... The difference between Dequinnemaere and the others should higher, nei? Not necessarily. For example, Brahm has 3 sprint while Dequinnemaere has 0, and there is almost 30km of sprint.
|
|
mrpiet
Amateur Team
Posts: 134
|
Post by mrpiet on Feb 22, 2007 20:32:38 GMT 1
For my cyclist the order they finished is exactly how i would expect it. But if there is a bug in the calculation i hope we can pinpoint it before the tour de france starts
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Feb 22, 2007 21:40:14 GMT 1
Not necessarily. For example, Brahm has 3 sprint while Dequinnemaere has 0, and there is almost 30km of sprint. But Dequinnemaere has 4 flat, 2 hill and 1 downhill. So him racing at 90% vs the sprinter (1 flat, 0 hill and 1 downhill) should imo result in a much larger time difference? Considering the race contains 117km of flat and 60km or what was it of hill...
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Feb 22, 2007 21:51:18 GMT 1
Ouf........ Somebody agrees with me. I was just beginning to think I am totally wrong with the way to use cyclists.
|
|