|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 18:50:42 GMT 1
Nah, if it would happen to me, I'd make an exception (just kidding) No, I thought you meant when someone buys a crappy cyclist from a friend for a lot of money, not a stranger. Of course, in that case, the transfer is simply nullified.
|
|
|
Post by ando on Feb 13, 2007 18:52:42 GMT 1
maybe you can make it possible for the GM to reverse a transfer, but with the one that overbidded banned
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 18:55:05 GMT 1
I think it would also be very good to imply a list of recent buyings (the expensive once) so that overpriced cyclists are discovered very easily and the cheaters will think twice to make a try and run
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 18:57:17 GMT 1
maybe you can make it possible for the GM to reverse a transfer, but with the one that overbidded banned No, that's technically too complicated. That would imply that there should be a history of biddings of all teams for all transfers. Which is way to inefficient and ultimately useless.
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 18:57:55 GMT 1
I think it would also be very good to imply a list of recent buyings (the expensive once) so that overpriced cyclists are discovered very easily and the cheaters will think twice to make a try and run You mean like top 20 list of most expensive transfers?
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:06:24 GMT 1
I think it would also be very good to imply a list of recent buyings (the expensive once) so that overpriced cyclists are discovered very easily and the cheaters will think twice to make a try and run You mean like top 20 list of most expensive transfers? something like that. The reason is that most of the useres are looking to it and so can a way to expensive bidding being tracked very easily. Now you have a link to report cheaters. On the transfer page you can (if possible) imply a link (right above) most expensive cyclists (of the week) (max 20 - 30). So high bidding on crappy cyclists will been seen. Because now there are getting more and more teams in peloton and it is not possible to track all individual teams just looking to transfers who are being made. example : a cyclist is listed at 15.00 the 14th of april. He is on the transfermarket. No one is bidding on him, because of high price asked. If at 14. 54 a bid is placed on the 14 th of april there is a possibily that some users see the transfer. But when the transfer is being made at 4 o'clock in the moring, hardly no one will see it. Transfer made, no one saw it and not everybody is checking up eacht team... You see my point?
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 19:08:22 GMT 1
But it would have to be a list relative to the transfervalue of a cyclist. Because a transfer of €100k isn't expensive for a cyclist who's worth €300k, but it is expensive for one who's worth €5k.
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:11:38 GMT 1
But it would have to be a list relative to the transfervalue of a cyclist. Because a transfer of €100k isn't expensive for a cyclist who's worth €300k, but it is expensive for one who's worth €5k. edited an example in last post. Isn't it possible to just put all transfers being made in a week in a specific link? Just the notification of the transfer. Day - from team A - to team B - price - current value then it is easy to see when an overpriced player is bought from team A to team B for the price of 400 k with a current value of 150.000 is looking wierd imho....
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Feb 13, 2007 19:14:10 GMT 1
you're right padrino but it's a start, maybe (since the game is growing) it's possible to try and find 2 more GM's? so sterre isn't alone anymore in the job
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 19:15:04 GMT 1
All transfers? Hm, right now it'd indeed be easy to see the suspicious transfers because there are relatively few transfers. But when the game gets to a point of hundreds or thousands of transfers per week, it will be practically impossible.
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 13, 2007 19:17:01 GMT 1
there are enough volunteers
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:17:51 GMT 1
you're right padrino but it's a start, maybe (since the game is growing) it's possible to try and find 2 more GM's? so sterre isn't alone anymore in the job it is not being difficult to look over the reports, but it is impossible to look to all the transferhistories of every team that is made.
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 13, 2007 19:18:00 GMT 1
couldn't you just make a simple internal log file (plain text or xml or something) so it can be easily imported in excell or something (making formulas to highlight extra-ordinary is then simple). and what's more it would also be possible to track which was the last legit offer .
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 19:19:15 GMT 1
Hm... that's a thought. Then there'd be a history for each week in xml form.
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:20:08 GMT 1
All transfers? Hm, right now it'd indeed be easy to see the suspicious transfers because there are relatively few transfers. But when the game gets to a point of hundreds or thousands of transfers per week, it will be practically impossible. also will the reports being made being more up to date because now most of the reports are nothing. Maybe also imply something in the announcements that overpriced buyings will be reducted to normal prices.
|
|