|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 13, 2007 19:22:14 GMT 1
the sheet I gave you once sterre was that good? (the system?)
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:22:28 GMT 1
Hm... that's a thought. Then there'd be a history for each week in xml form. something like that. Users can report it and then the reports being made can be easily overlooked. Now they are few valuable reports, and i think it is not the meaning to look to all the teams there transferhistories.
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:24:36 GMT 1
the sheet I gave you once sterre was that good? (the system?) the sheet was good. I think something like in hattrick is easily to imply ==> RIGHT NOW 25 most recent transfers Most expensive of the week in België! Most expensive of the week (internationally)!
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 13, 2007 19:26:22 GMT 1
Btw Padrino I think there should be a lock on players without trainer and sponsor (the shouldn't be allowed to buy) because most of them are cheaters.
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 13, 2007 19:27:19 GMT 1
sterre & Il Padrino : BTW : shouldn't you guys make this kind of discussions in the GM-forum ?
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:27:22 GMT 1
Btw Padrino I think there should be a lock on players without trainer and sponsor (the shouldn't be allowed to buy) because most of them are cheaters. this is one of the current things that I overlook when expensive buyings are made.
|
|
|
Post by sterre on Feb 13, 2007 19:29:18 GMT 1
sterre & Il Padrino : BTW : shouldn't you guys make this kind of discussions in the GM-forum ? See some posts back ( see edit ). But users are asking, so we are looking over the suggestions that are being made. Being a GM doesn't make me god edit : I assume that each case is different. If there is a link to eachothers team, than the teams get banned. If there is no indication that the teams are '2 in 1' than there is another approach to deal with it. I think it is not appropriate to discuss this on a forum, otherwhise it is going to get very easy for 'future' cheaters to deal with it. Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 13, 2007 19:32:35 GMT 1
it is a pity i can't move parts of a post else this topic could be cleaned and the interesting parts moved to the GM-forum.
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 13, 2007 19:34:35 GMT 1
Btw Padrino I think there should be a lock on players without trainer and sponsor (the shouldn't be allowed to buy) because most of them are cheaters. Why should they be locked? All new teams start without trainer and sponsor, and you're not obliged to have either.
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 13, 2007 19:36:37 GMT 1
no I know but I followed a few who boucht players the first day they had a team ---> never logged in again
|
|
|
Post by ando on Feb 13, 2007 19:39:21 GMT 1
maybe locked from buying not from the game
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 13, 2007 19:40:45 GMT 1
that was what I ment
|
|
kooltje
U23 Developm. Team
Posts: 53
|
Post by kooltje on Feb 15, 2007 15:13:42 GMT 1
i give up two cheaters. do i receive a message or nothing?
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Feb 15, 2007 15:14:53 GMT 1
nope you receive nothing
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 15, 2007 15:17:32 GMT 1
If you report cheaters you will not get any information about how this was dealt with. (I know it's mentioned somewhere in this topic but I can't seem to find it anymore).
|
|