|
|
Post by beckyblack on Apr 22, 2009 21:22:30 GMT 1
Can I suggest that when the table is reset at the end of the season you keep the teams in their finishing order with the promoting teams slotting into the place vacated by the relegating team.
This will make it much easier to check up on the teams that have been promoted rather than having to look through all the teams to find out which of them are new
|
|
enjee
Amateur Team
Posts: 83
|
Post by enjee on Apr 22, 2009 22:32:50 GMT 1
Probably suggested before, but I'd like to see a international league, where the top team of every country can promote to, and for the smaller countries maybe who had the most points... If you end low you just relegate to the country 1:1 again... wouldn't that be cool? (like I said, probably already suggested tons of times but couldnt find it) Not sure I like this suggestion. I've won the top division in Spain for the last two seasons and the two seasons before that I finished 3rd, it is a constant battle between 3 teams (hopefully more are joining in the outskirts of the battle each season). However I cannot compete against the Belgian and Dutch teams who have been around far longer than me. After a few seasons the top teams would all dominate the 'Champions League' so this league would simply end up being a replica of the current Belgian 1.01 with a few Dutch teams thrown in and possible an Italian. In the meantime if I was very lucky I might spend two seasons in this Champion's league where I'd spend the whole time fighting to get a few points and the odd top 20 finish. My fans would desert me and I'd earn no prize money. When I was relegated back down to the Spanish first division my fellow combatants would have benefited from a year of success compared to my year struggling. You are right, only Dutch teams (Belgium and Holland) would be able to win because the amount of players from those countries... There should be some solutions for it, for now I rest my case, back to the drawingboard. |
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Apr 28, 2009 13:48:35 GMT 1
It would be very nice that you could mark your news messages as "unread" and so the envelop would still be visible.
In this way, I could mark my "the contract of your cyclist will expire in 1 week" as unread, so I will not forget anymore to actually offer a new contract !
|
|
|
|
Post by piantato on Apr 28, 2009 22:30:42 GMT 1
My advice: To reassess the use of the scout, lowering the age of the cyclists up to 16 years instead of the current 18 years. That would be a new incentive to invest in young
|
|
|
|
Post by lee1950 on Apr 29, 2009 2:40:58 GMT 1
It would be very nice that you could mark your news messages as "unread" and so the envelop would still be visible. In this way, I could mark my "the contract of your cyclist will expire in 1 week" as unread, so I will not forget anymore to actually offer a new contract ! This is a great suggestion, and would be very useful - I need all the organizing help I can get! (Imagine emoticon for absent-minded man here) |
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Apr 29, 2009 13:50:29 GMT 1
Hello
i think that the no team riders could only appear on the end of season and in the week before the beginning of the new season.
The teams that loose managers during the season the rider only appear in that two weeks, its better for the game and for the players.
Our we are going to see all the weeks this no team rider on the market put the prices down?
|
|
|
|
Post by droopy on May 1, 2009 10:58:57 GMT 1
About the no team riders
Where do they come from? From all the teams in peloton history? Just last season? What about the 18 yo with pull dates in previous seasons? No team riders also should be able to have a party on their birthday.
|
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on May 1, 2009 12:28:33 GMT 1
They come from the botteams who are replaced by real teams and are permanently deleted from the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by droopy on May 3, 2009 10:38:55 GMT 1
Do 'no team riders' become older in the mid season?
|
|
|
|
Post by spijk101 on May 3, 2009 11:17:09 GMT 1
Apparently, there is a problem with the aging of some riders. Look at the following example: Toon Van Hoe (137557) www.peloton-game.net/cyclistdetails.aspx?id=137557his age is 19 while he started his career at 6/15/2008 (see cyclist history). Given his id-number and his starting date he can never be 19. There is another example: Jean-Daniel Braibant (99957) www.peloton-game.net/cyclistdetails.aspx?id=99957This cyclist is only 20, while he started his career in February 2008. Also, take a look at his id-number. These two examples are just two out of more. When you look at the youth rankings of Paris-Nice this year made by Schizm, you can see that there are more cyclists with the same “age problem”. For example, the numbers 2, 4, 5 and 28. This problem has consequences for division points earned in the youth rankings, but i can also imagine that this problem occurs with cyclists older than 20. |
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on May 3, 2009 14:52:18 GMT 1
Apparently, there is a problem with the aging of some riders. Look at the following example: Toon Van Hoe (137557) www.peloton-game.net/cyclistdetails.aspx?id=137557his age is 19 while he started his career at 6/15/2008 (see cyclist history). Given his id-number and his starting date he can never be 19. There is another example: Jean-Daniel Braibant (99957) www.peloton-game.net/cyclistdetails.aspx?id=99957This cyclist is only 20, while he started his career in February 2008. Also, take a look at his id-number. These two examples are just two out of more. When you look at the youth rankings of Paris-Nice this year made by Schizm, you can see that there are more cyclists with the same “age problem”. For example, the numbers 2, 4, 5 and 28. This problem has consequences for division points earned in the youth rankings, but i can also imagine that this problem occurs with cyclists older than 20. Cyclist from teams with no manager were "frozen" they didn't get no training anymore and they didn't age. But in the bugs topic IP also announced after some complaints about 18 year old no-teamers on the market that next time they will age. I know this means you have to adjust the formula for estimating the FA of the No-teamers, you have to subtract the weeks they were in an inactive team. |
|
|
|
Post by spijk101 on May 3, 2009 15:12:28 GMT 1
Ok, I've just read the bugs topic and it's a good thing all cyclists will age next season. I wasn't concerned about estimation of the FA, but the fairness of the (youth) standings. Alhough these cyclists did not receive any training over the period they were inactive, they clearly have some advantage over the regular cyclists.
Imagine a cyclist who has been trained almost all season, but fired near the end of a season. Since he was teamless he did not age. He was bought by a new team in the following season and received training again. That is an advantage for both the cyclist and the new owner.
Well, anyway it's a good thing this will not be possible from next season on. Thanks for the answer Schizm!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Jun 8, 2009 21:42:07 GMT 1
yesterday I got a warning that my premium account was about to expire.
It expired today.
That's only 1 day warning in advance. I would like to see this warning message at least a weak or so earlyer, thx
|
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Jun 9, 2009 10:19:49 GMT 1
Yes, the message given in the update, says that premium will expire in the next week. If your premium expires on a Monday, it is indeed a bit short  I will change this to 2 weeks in advance then. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Jun 9, 2009 14:57:16 GMT 1
thx
|
|
.gif"]
Melres United
