Small suggestions

[NikeBoy]

If you have a great team (i.e. 5 good overall cyclists), you are already rewarded with a lot of money because they all end very high in the final standings.
Offcourse, because they end so high, you also win the team standing. So that would lead to double money.

I like the idea of having a team standing, but don't link this with any money, just honor

[sila]

A news with the pull ciclyst from touth will be verry youthfull.

Or a new table with the job done by the youthscouts .... the day when he search and the cyclist found.

[boucthesurvivor]

For the moderators : there are many sticky topics in the General Discussion section, that makes this section less readable.
I think that the FAQ topic for instance could be un-sticked.

[stefkeswoon]

Mountain points tables: I've taken a look on several of those and only once (!) found that there were 10 cyclists with points. Usually there are like 6,7 or 8 cyclists with mountain points and that's it.
Problem? The remaining places are filled up with the best classified cyclists in time table. That means that winning the time jersey very often implies winning a 8th place bonus in mountain points table (=+7000$). It's a bit unfair, because those cyclists don't deserve that bonus more than any other cyclists with 0 points. On top of that, you reward the best cyclist(s) twice, which is unnecessary.

I see three solutions for this:
1. Cyclists with 0 points cannot receive bonusses.
2. Only cyclists that are selected to strive for mountain points can receive bonusses, allthough they haven't actually gained some. In that way, only cyclists that have done an effort for it will get some money. Sorting the 0-points-cyclists on time table results is ok then. (Problem: you could select your best cyclist for mountain points one day and even if he doesn't get any points, he will get the money because of his time table result.)
3. Reduce the number of bonusses for the mountain jersey standings. For example: only the top-5 or top-7 get a bonus.
You eventually can make those bonusses higher.

And maybe this only accounts for small tours and not for big tours. However, there should be done something about the small tour mountain bonusses then.

(I've selected three different cyclist for mountain points both in Paris-Nice as in Tirreno-Adriatico, because I knew one silly point would be enough to win quite some money in the end. I think that's a stupid way to make money. )

[Il Padrino]

I opt for option 1.

[boucthesurvivor]

2 suggestions :
- a limitation on the number of cyclists you can put on the transfer list per 24h (5 by example).
- a global add that can be buy (for 100 000€) when you want everybody to be aware of the selling of a very good cyclist (not everybody read this forum). It could have the shape of a defiling ("défilante" in French ) sentence with a link in the top of the site peloton-game.

Just 2 ideas I don't know if they are good.

[Il Padrino]

Suggestion 1 sounds interesting
Suggestion 2 a little less

Let's hear what the rest says

[CableGuy]

- Suggestion 1: I have no problem with that ... I don't know why you would like this feature, though. Only reason I can think of is that a hacker could only sell 5 players a day from your team. But he still can fire them ...

- Suggestion 2: Can I pay also 100.000 to not get these annoying messages displayed on my pages then?

[boucthesurvivor]

cableguy said:

- Suggestion 1: I have no problem with that ... I don't know why you would like this feature, though. Only reason I can think of is that a hacker could only sell 5 players a day from your team. But he still can fire them ...

- Suggestion 2: Can I pay also 100.000 to not get these annoying messages displayed on my pages then?

Suggestion 1 : Regularly, there are teams who sell out the whole team. Think one minute about the manager who wanted to sell his cyclist at a good price, but whose cyclist will be under-valeud because of the big amount of cyclist at the same time...
You can also limit the number of firing... ;D

Suggestion 2 : ;D

[boucthesurvivor]

A small suggestion : in the statistics : the overall repartition of the trainings. How many people train what skill.

[stefkeswoon]

I'd like to search for cyclists sometimes. Can you make that possible too (search cyclist name)?

[Ambi]

The possibility of deleting people of your fanclub.
I currently have 8 people in my fanclub of which 2 bots and 4 non premiums.
I'd like to delete all bots and non premiums from my fanclub but there is no way to do it

[Stinus1986]

Is it possible to display the cyclist with the highest transfervalue at the statisticspage of each country?

[caner26]

First is: Is it possible to have the Secondary skills shown on the Cyclists page?

second: maybe nothing. Let all winners op the 1.1 division from each country play in a "Pro-Tour League". At the moment there are 7 countries. So you could have a extra league with the 7 teams of the world.

I have been thinking about what happens in that case after season 1 because if you would only replace the 2 worst countries, that would not be fair.
I think maybe it would be nice to let the winning team in the pro tour stay and all other go back to there country division 1.1 and the new winners of each country promote to the pro tour. So unless you win the pro tour you will only participate for one year.

With the current number of countries we would play with 8 teams ( 7 countries and the defending champion.)

[Ambi]

1) The pro-tour idea has been suggested about 100 times
2) I think it should be something like the champions league system.
-Let all teams participate one season and have new teams next year.
-Let the number of teams from each country be decided from the strength of a country (it is logic that belgium should have more teams than germany)