|
|
Post by danpark on Jun 28, 2013 11:38:35 GMT 1
I think that it is a bit unfair that short tours (3-4 stages) give the same amount of division points as the big three tours (Giro-Tour-Vuelta - more that 10 stages). Big tours give already more money than short tours, so maybe it would be useful to increase also the division points. I tried two solutions: a 1,5x increase and a 2x increase; what do you think about it?  |
|
|
|
Post by aaabbbccc on Jan 23, 2014 15:28:17 GMT 1
Why don't we do that? I think It's a brilliant Idea because you need a fantastic cyclist to win the big tour, instead of a little tour where you can win also without a top player. I think the points have to be increased before the giro. There are 9-11 stages in the big tours, in the littles only 3-5 so I think It's necessary.
|
|
|
|
Post by danpark on Jan 27, 2014 15:16:49 GMT 1
Well, of course I agree!  |
|
|
|
Post by goof on Jan 28, 2014 11:59:00 GMT 1
It would make sense if the ratio money/points would be the same for the big tours as for the small ones. This means that big tours should give about 2.5 times more points than small tours.
|
|
|
|
Post by aaabbbccc on Jan 28, 2014 14:48:26 GMT 1
Yes but also 1,5 or 2 is good, also because with 2,5 if someone win all tree big tours is promoted yet... But I think is true because if you win all three you are the best!!!  |
|
