|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Mar 20, 2007 17:55:54 GMT 1
Could the shortlist at least have an extra field for transfer deadline time and date? And it would be even better if you could place the shortlisted cyclist in order of transfer time. done! That will be very useful!  |
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 20, 2007 18:03:37 GMT 1
Could the shortlist at least have an extra field for transfer deadline time and date? And it would be even better if you could place the shortlisted cyclist in order of transfer time. done! it would be nice if you could reverse the order or something, in a way that cyclists with a deadline are listed first when you sort on that field. |
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Mar 20, 2007 18:08:51 GMT 1
Other ideas for the stats :
- mean value of the cyclists of the team (i.e. Highest[ total value of cyclists / number of cyclists to be clear] ^^)
- biggest fanclub
- The cyclist with the biggest transfer value.
|
|
|
|
Post by CableGuy on Mar 20, 2007 18:15:04 GMT 1
- Highest number of consecutive team wins
- Highest number of consecutive cyclist wins
- Highest number of time jerseys
- Highest number of mountain jerseys
- Highest number of sprint jerseys
- Lowest average age of cyclists
- Highest average age of cyclists
- Highest number of current injury weeks per team
- Highest average cyclist length
- Lowest average cyclist weight
|
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 20, 2007 18:17:46 GMT 1
that should keep me busy this week  |
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Mar 20, 2007 18:18:32 GMT 1
Question to CG: What does consecutive mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by CableGuy on Mar 20, 2007 18:23:51 GMT 1
- Highest number of consecutive team wins = winning streak without interruption by a win of a cyclist of another team
- Highest number of consecutive cyclist wins = winning streak without interruption by a win of another cyclist, even one of your own team
|
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 20, 2007 18:45:03 GMT 1
consecutive = in a row |
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Mar 20, 2007 20:40:54 GMT 1
If it's possible: To ad that you can't bid anymore on a cyclist if you already have bid on one wich would make you go under -100.000
F.E.
I have 400k in my bank and bid on a cyclist 500k
then I will have -100.000 but now it's possible if the transfer isn't over yet for me to bid another 500k on another cyclist. This would make -600.000
So if it's possible to make it that this can't happen anymore?
|
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 20, 2007 20:47:28 GMT 1
In other words, take current bids into account when evaluating the balance. Yes, I was supposed to do this some time ago.. I'll do it by this weekend (if I don't forget).
|
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Mar 20, 2007 20:59:02 GMT 1
Put it in your team notes I did it and they work great (with reminder date) |
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 20, 2007 22:29:27 GMT 1
Oh yeah, forgot about those |
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 21, 2007 14:18:11 GMT 1
If it's possible: To ad that you can't bid anymore on a cyclist if you already have bid on one wich would make you go under -100.000 F.E. I have 400k in my bank and bid on a cyclist 500k then I will have -100.000 but now it's possible if the transfer isn't over yet for me to bid another 500k on another cyclist. This would make -600.000 So if it's possible to make it that this can't happen anymore? Ok, done. |
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 21, 2007 14:36:17 GMT 1
If it's possible: To ad that you can't bid anymore on a cyclist if you already have bid on one wich would make you go under -100.000 F.E. I have 400k in my bank and bid on a cyclist 500k then I will have -100.000 but now it's possible if the transfer isn't over yet for me to bid another 500k on another cyclist. This would make -600.000 So if it's possible to make it that this can't happen anymore? Ok, done. does this count as well in the positive as the negative way ? p.e. : If I have a bid of 1 million on one of my cyclists can I bid 1 million more on another one ? |
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 21, 2007 14:52:07 GMT 1
No, because there's always the chance that you bid on your own cyclist later on.
|
|
