|
|
Post by CableGuy on Mar 13, 2007 14:06:55 GMT 1
With a fitness trainer, you tend to let your cyclists go down to 60% fitness and then train them to 100% again with 20+20% fitness training. So far so good. However, if for one reason or another, one of your cyclists was below 60%, you can see that the increase in fitness is a little bit higher than expected:  With a fitness trainer of 20 on fitness, the effect is 1,6% extra. With a fitness trainer of 10 on fitness, the effect is 1,2% extra. My conclusion: a small bug is present which is proportional to the total fitness a cyclist gains. Fitness skill trainer = 20 => total fitness gain = 40% => in reality: 0,04 * 40% extra = 1,6% => 41,6% Fitness skill trainer = 10 => total fitness gain = 30% => in reality: 0,04 * 30% extra = 1,2% => 31,2% |
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Mar 13, 2007 14:12:50 GMT 1
Thanks for the notification. This has now been fixed |
|
|
|
Post by Rattlehead on Mar 14, 2007 16:35:51 GMT 1
Damn, has this been fixed ?  I know someone who had already noticed this. Not thinking this would be a bug, he let his riders drop to 59, so with another fitness training they would go back to 100. But if it's fixed, it will be 99 of course. It's a small detail, but in a tour of several successive races at 1% less, this makes already quite a notable time loss.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Mar 14, 2007 17:59:28 GMT 1
Not as big a loss as falls suddenly in the middle of a tour starting to actually count....
|
|
|
|
Post by discolex on Mar 14, 2007 18:03:40 GMT 1
No no, falls suddenly counting from the middle of a tour is not a loss. It's no longer an advantage  |
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Mar 14, 2007 18:29:06 GMT 1
Well the same goes for this fitness thingie, don't you think  |
|
|
|
Post by discolex on Mar 14, 2007 18:30:34 GMT 1
+1 karma for you my friend  |
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Mar 14, 2007 18:45:40 GMT 1
I appreciate the gesture, even if the whole Karma thing makes me laugh  I've returned the favour nonetheless! |
|
|
|
Post by coureurtjen on Mar 16, 2007 10:41:02 GMT 1
I've seen it with what you've done with mine...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sjorskeum on Mar 16, 2007 11:37:19 GMT 1
I just don't like you. What's some 25 on a total of 1.000.025 anyway  |
|
|
|
Post by CableGuy on Mar 26, 2007 0:24:28 GMT 1
It seems the small I-get-a-littlebit-too-much-fitness-bug is back, though it seems completely random:
Hastings Van Neck => expected 80% => got 80%
Dautlon Thuy => expected 90% => got 92%
Teiki Robette => expected 65% => got 66,8%
Igor Dufour => expected 65% => got 66,2%
|
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 26, 2007 7:45:18 GMT 1
it is not random Van Neck is 30, Thuy 20, Robette 21 and Dufour must be 24 ... appearantly you receive 0,2 % extra per year under 30. I had the same thing when I trained on fitness but with 0,15% (my trainer has 15 fitness).
|
|
|
|
Post by CableGuy on Mar 26, 2007 7:51:42 GMT 1
Aha, thanx for clarifying. |
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 26, 2007 7:52:31 GMT 1
in english please and your welcome |
|
