|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Mar 21, 2007 19:26:51 GMT 1
Yesterday, for the Deutschland tour, cyclists with 0 point won in the Mountain standings during the tour seem to have earnt money because they were in the 10 first places... I think it's unfair, because they've have surely been chosen randomly. Would it be possible to add a condition of winning at least 1 point to earn money? I think this case will be again for little tours with a few mountain.
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 21, 2007 19:43:22 GMT 1
they are not choosen randomly but in order of their general clasification, but I agree that having a lot of cyclists with 0 mountain-points winning money is not the right system. I would suggest that stages which have more then f.i. 50% mountain and hill in them, also points will be rewarded (in the same way as for the green jersey).
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Mar 21, 2007 19:59:26 GMT 1
I agree with you, that's done on the final standings. But I can't understand your suggestion. This has no equivalent with IRL money prices!!
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 21, 2007 20:09:31 GMT 1
I know it is not like in real cycling, but because my earlier suggestion about mountain-categories was to hard to implement right away, I thought this could be a preliminary solution to distribute more mountain points to the climbers.
|
|
|
Post by boucthesurvivor on Mar 21, 2007 20:19:06 GMT 1
Ah yes, ok, that is another debate. On this particular case, only a single test on the number of mountain points is enough.
|
|
|
Post by stefkeswoon on Mar 22, 2007 14:25:53 GMT 1
Thing is: be smart, and select several cyclists for mountain points during a tour. That way you'll sometimes earn extra money thanks to one mountain point...
|
|