Post by stefkeswoon on Mar 6, 2007 10:02:38 GMT 1
I checked out a division of a friend of mine (division 4:26) and i found these standings in the TdF:
Pos Cyclist Pts Mou Time Team
1. Cuyvers 4 1 04:14:34 hoopopzegen
2. Van Den Bogaert 0 0 +2:08 hoopopzegen
3. Verdegem 0 0 +2:08 hoopopzegen
4. De Ryckel 0 0 +3:10 hoopopzegen
5. Westerhof 0 0 +4:19 hoopopzegen
6. Zoeters 0 5 +1:40:48 wsc hoop op zegen
7. Dekker 0 0 +1:43:12 wsc hoop op zegen
8. De Theux 0 0 +1:44:15 wsc hoop op zegen
9. Esquenet 0 0 +1:48:19 wsc hoop op zegen
10. de Beun 0 0 +1:50:55 wsc hoop op zegen
11. Reynaert 50 0 +5:291:05 't vliegend wiel
12. Chenot 18 30 +5:291:15 't vliegend wiel
13. Bredo 9 0 +5:292:22 't vliegend wiel
14. Van Rillaer 15 0 +5:293:15 't vliegend wiel
Very weird in my opinion. The results look very normal, so there's something going wrong with the standings. I didn't see any other thread/post about something like that, so maybe it's a one-shot-error?
Pos Cyclist Pts Mou Time Team
1. Cuyvers 4 1 04:14:34 hoopopzegen
2. Van Den Bogaert 0 0 +2:08 hoopopzegen
3. Verdegem 0 0 +2:08 hoopopzegen
4. De Ryckel 0 0 +3:10 hoopopzegen
5. Westerhof 0 0 +4:19 hoopopzegen
6. Zoeters 0 5 +1:40:48 wsc hoop op zegen
7. Dekker 0 0 +1:43:12 wsc hoop op zegen
8. De Theux 0 0 +1:44:15 wsc hoop op zegen
9. Esquenet 0 0 +1:48:19 wsc hoop op zegen
10. de Beun 0 0 +1:50:55 wsc hoop op zegen
11. Reynaert 50 0 +5:291:05 't vliegend wiel
12. Chenot 18 30 +5:291:15 't vliegend wiel
13. Bredo 9 0 +5:292:22 't vliegend wiel
14. Van Rillaer 15 0 +5:293:15 't vliegend wiel
Very weird in my opinion. The results look very normal, so there's something going wrong with the standings. I didn't see any other thread/post about something like that, so maybe it's a one-shot-error?
