|
Post by sila on Feb 23, 2007 18:12:57 GMT 1
And the recalculation it's done. Just like the first time! Or almost the same!
|
|
|
Post by cipt2001 on Feb 23, 2007 18:14:01 GMT 1
I really don't understand these recalculations. I understand it was a bug, but I don't agree with the recalculations. The bug was there for all the managers, so...
Maybe make a poll about this course of action or something. Correcting a bug is OK, but I don't see the point of recalculating the races. Why not recalculate the entire season in one night then? (of course I exaggerate, but only to make a point).
|
|
|
Post by thenose1 on Feb 23, 2007 18:14:23 GMT 1
Hmm, first stage i won by 1.30, now i lost by 1.28. Is that a random factor or did something change in the calculation? (both cyclists werde both times biking at 70%)
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Feb 23, 2007 18:16:28 GMT 1
Hard to tell, maybe the other managers changed some of their tactics.
|
|
|
Post by jasperkoekie on Feb 23, 2007 18:17:07 GMT 1
Damn i don't get that recalculation, before the recalc i won the stage with my best rider, and now he was 2nd en got injured so all my aspirations are gone! why recalc the first stage...
|
|
|
Post by gelies on Feb 23, 2007 18:17:24 GMT 1
mmmm the recalculation look weird too...very big difference of time between riders.... let'see if somebody else find it weird...
|
|
|
Post by jasperkoekie on Feb 23, 2007 18:18:15 GMT 1
I asked the owner of the new winner of the first stage and his tactics were the same....
|
|
|
Post by Ambi on Feb 23, 2007 18:19:00 GMT 1
Nope it's still fine with my division... my cyclist (I think he has the best chance of winning) ended 2nd behind someone who drove at 100% so ....
|
|
|
Post by sila on Feb 23, 2007 18:19:41 GMT 1
i was sure that will be some complains!
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Feb 23, 2007 18:20:19 GMT 1
I'm finding the differences a bit to big to, there sure weren't that kind of differences the first time this stage was run the first 4 are all cyclists that scored for the mountain jersey between the 4th and the fifth there is a gap of almost 6 minutes !
|
|
|
Post by thenose1 on Feb 23, 2007 18:25:23 GMT 1
The one who now won didn't change his tactics. That's a difference of 3 minutes, with both cyclists using the same tactics. Seems weird to me..... (and also there are big differences, between no1 and no7 there is 10 minutes in my division.....)
|
|
|
Post by stealthisnick on Feb 23, 2007 18:26:45 GMT 1
I'm finding the differences a bit to big to, there sure weren't that kind of differences the first time this stage was run the first 4 are all cyclists that scored for the mountain jersey between the 4th and the fifth there is a gap of almost 6 minutes ! also on my division
|
|
|
Post by sila on Feb 23, 2007 18:28:28 GMT 1
Cyclist who participate both in sprints and mountains seems to have a litle advantage.
|
|
|
Post by sila on Feb 23, 2007 18:31:13 GMT 1
Does anybody win the race or came second and don't participate in sprints and mountings?
|
|
|
Post by jurgencavens on Feb 23, 2007 18:35:04 GMT 1
Why this reset of 2 days? Now I don't participate in the Dauphiné, although yesterday I won the first stage.
|
|