|
Post by madbiker on Jan 11, 2007 16:17:00 GMT 1
I'm most likely to go bankrupt one of these weeks.My question is,can I get a new team right away or do I have to wait a cuple of months(like in Hattrick)?
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Jan 11, 2007 16:19:17 GMT 1
it'd be better to try to save your team than to just start over. if everyone would do that...
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Jan 11, 2007 17:44:33 GMT 1
mmm since the "no buying of cyclists if your balance is under zero"-rule I'm also considering starting over (in division 4 and lose my topspot in division 2). I get depressed just by looking at the transfermarket and all the cyclists I can't buy please reconsider this rule so that I can stop regretting the fact that I spend to much money on my staff (still suposing I could buy cyclists 'till i got under -500k).
|
|
|
Post by purplelaurens on Jan 11, 2007 18:25:50 GMT 1
mmm since the "no buying of cyclists if your balance is under zero"-rule I'm also considering starting over (in division 4 and lose my topspot in division 2). I get depressed just by looking at the transfermarket and all the cyclists I can't buy please reconsider this rule so that I can stop regretting the fact that I spend to much money on my staff (still suposing I could buy cyclists 'till i got under -500k). just win some races next week and buy those cyclists
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Jan 11, 2007 18:57:32 GMT 1
ok, i've changed the rule: you can now buy cyclists when you have -100k as future balance.
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Jan 11, 2007 19:12:15 GMT 1
thank you
|
|
|
Post by stefkeswoon on Jan 11, 2007 19:47:31 GMT 1
ok, i've changed the rule: you can now buy cyclists when you have -100k as future balance.
Dear Il Padrino, allthough I appreciate your enormous work on this game and allthough I think it's wonderful you still listen to our proposals and implement the best ones, still I do feel you do not need to rush in changes like these so hastily. this important transfer rule has now been changed two times in a short time, two times without notification. One has to read all the fora threats to know this. That ain't no good policy, I guess. I'm not critisizing the game or this rule in particular (in fact, I don't think this change has any advantage or disadvantage in general, allthough it will change some things in the short run), I'm just advising you: don't change important things too fast. Stick to your own thought. And if you think you should change something, you should stay put to that ánd communicate it to the Peloton Community.
I hope i don't look too critic, bossy, paternal or anything like that. Just a hint. Keep up the fine work you're doing, Thomas
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Jan 11, 2007 20:12:30 GMT 1
he has a point you know, especially about the communication, but I'm still happy you made the rule a bit more flexible
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Jan 11, 2007 21:04:15 GMT 1
actually it was more like this: first the limit wasn't at all working, so you could buy even when you had -1 million. then I fixed it, so you could only buy when you had a positive balance. and now I've changed it so that the system is a bit more forgiving. so I actually made 1 correction and 1 change
|
|
|
Post by stefkeswoon on Jan 11, 2007 21:44:44 GMT 1
yeah, i know. that's why i said it wasn't meant as a critique. i just wanted to hint you: don't bow too quick for peoples requests (i'm not saying you did now) and communicate when you do change something important. i just don't want this fantastic game to suffer poor communication and therefore dissatisfied gamers. i love you! i love Peloton! ;D (drooldrool)
|
|