|
Post by Schizm on Nov 1, 2011 21:39:53 GMT 1
you have to do it like this make a list of your riders sorted ascending f.i. AC-1 BH-1 CE-1 DA-1 EM-1 FS-2 GB-2 HD-2 II-2 JM-2 KK-2 LA-3 and then one descending ; LA-3 JM-2 KK-2 II-2 HD-2 GB-2 FS-2 CE-1 DA-1 EM-1 AC-1 BH-1 Those who are not exactly in reversed order have the same skill. f.i. AC and BH - also CE, DA and EM and since you know there are only 5 possible decimals per skillpont you can conclude that the lowest 2 have 1.0 or 1.2 or 1.4 or 1.6 and the three above have 1.2 or 1.4 or 1.6 or 1.8. so you don't know exactly who has 1.2 and who has 1.4 or 1.6 right? What's the reason than that users are sorting this players? But in the example you do know that JM and KK have 2.8, II has 2.6, HD gets 2.4, GB has 2.2 and FS has 2.0 !
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Nov 6, 2011 20:30:23 GMT 1
At trainer skill 16 I have a new 18 year old rider that popped to 3 from 2.80 before training.
|
|
|
Post by kingstown on Nov 6, 2011 20:46:13 GMT 1
With a trainer level 15 i have a rider from my original squad that hasn't popped yet. No injuries.
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Nov 6, 2011 20:55:05 GMT 1
My 18 and 19 year old cyclists that started at 2.0 popped this week. My 22 year old rider didn't pop yet after 6 trainings. he'll probably be around 2.98 now.
|
|
|
Post by Quatannens on Nov 6, 2011 21:46:19 GMT 1
I have an 18-year old cyclist that didn't popped yet with 6 trainings. Only difference is that my trainer always was one lower then yours. I also have a cyclist that didn't popped from 1 to 2 with 6 trainings, so the different trainingspeed on low levels seems very little.
|
|
|
Post by lee1950 on Nov 7, 2011 8:31:26 GMT 1
One of my original 12 hasn't popped, also. 21yo. My trainer was a bit slow: 10, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 for the 1st 6 weeks.
I had 8 pops yesterday and 6 last week. I think only 1 next week, though....the 21yo.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Nov 7, 2011 10:07:06 GMT 1
I have an 18-year old cyclist that didn't popped yet with 6 trainings. Only difference is that my trainer always was one lower then yours. I also have a cyclist that didn't popped from 1 to 2 with 6 trainings, so the different trainingspeed on low levels seems very little. It means that your rider start with 1.0 in mountain, and he must have now about 1.95.
|
|
kevinvl
U23 Developm. Team
kevin_vl - Cycling Team Jos (276)
Posts: 60
|
Post by kevinvl on Nov 7, 2011 11:08:01 GMT 1
Hey guys, all of you that think that you're cyclists hadn't popped because you didn't got a message... I think you've got to dubble check, because peloton doesn't gives you information anymore if you're cyclist pops, unless you have premium.. (I had the same problem )
|
|
|
Post by kingstown on Nov 7, 2011 11:32:43 GMT 1
Hey guys, all of you that think that you're cyclists hadn't popped because you didn't got a message... I think you've got to dubble check, because peloton doesn't gives you information anymore if you're cyclist pops, unless you have premium.. (I had the same problem ) I have premium and i have my own excell sheet, so i know for sure he didn't pop so far.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Nov 7, 2011 14:16:34 GMT 1
Hey guys, all of you that think that you're cyclists hadn't popped because you didn't got a message... I think you've got to dubble check, because peloton doesn't gives you information anymore if you're cyclist pops, unless you have premium.. (I had the same problem ) Most people control the evolution on an Excel file, so we don´t need to be online to know
|
|
|
Post by Il Padrino on Nov 7, 2011 15:56:17 GMT 1
Hence why it became a Premium feature ;D
|
|
triplef
Amateur Team
Team Camargue
Posts: 138
|
Post by triplef on Nov 7, 2011 17:10:56 GMT 1
Hence why it became a Premium feature ;D of course, the ones that have the excel spreadsheets are probably also the ones that are premium members too, i.e. the most rabid players...
|
|
|
Post by lee1950 on Nov 7, 2011 18:27:36 GMT 1
Woof!!
|
|
|
Post by zakelijk on Nov 7, 2011 21:11:04 GMT 1
so you don't know exactly who has 1.2 and who has 1.4 or 1.6 right? What's the reason than that users are sorting this players? But in the example you do know that JM and KK have 2.8, II has 2.6, HD gets 2.4, GB has 2.2 and FS has 2.0 ! I don't really get it how you know this, this players are sorted by why GB and FS doesn't have 2.0, HD 2.2, II 2.4, KK 2.6 and JM 2.8 (what's the reason you are sure JM and KK have 2.8?)
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Nov 7, 2011 23:11:26 GMT 1
But in the example you do know that JM and KK have 2.8, II has 2.6, HD gets 2.4, GB has 2.2 and FS has 2.0 ! I don't really get it how you know this, this players are sorted by why GB and FS doesn't have 2.0, HD 2.2, II 2.4, KK 2.6 and JM 2.8 (what's the reason you are sure JM and KK have 2.8?) because there are only 5 possible decimals at the start and because the order of JM and KK does not change when resorted (descending vs ascending).
|
|