|
Post by bosko on Mar 28, 2017 13:38:56 GMT 1
I think something went wrong at the first attack point (Mountain; 12km; 7%). When I only look at the time of my cyclists after the first part:
- Zijerveld: MO: 7; SP: 1 (Fitness: 80%; Effort 100%) -> 30:31 - Quintal: MO: 10; SP: 4 (Fitness: 95%; Effort 100%) -> 31:44 - Blairon: MO: 9; SP: 7 (Fitness: 100%; Effort 90%) -> 32:16
After the first attack point, Zijerveld was the only one of the whole peloton who was able to follow Canart (who won the race easily). How is that possible with those stats? I know I should be happy with it, but it doesn't make sence to me. Anyone an idea what could have happend?
|
|
|
Post by bosko on Apr 11, 2017 12:48:07 GMT 1
Again, today, I saw some strange results after the first attack point. Race: linkI attacked with all 5 of my cyclists (to let some youngsters gain experience). Stats and time of my cyclists after the first part: 1) Amoretti: MO: 8; SP: 4 (Fitness: 100%; Effort 100%) -> 40:07 2) Thomson: MO: 8; SP: 7 (Fitness: 99%; Effort 100%) -> 40:37 3) Quintal: MO: 10; SP: 4 (Fitness: 84%; Effort 100%) -> 41:20 4) Paul: MO: 10; SP: 7 (Fitness: 100%; Effort 100%) -> 41:20 5) Liang: MO: 8; SP: 2 (Fitness: 100%; Effort 100%) -> 41:59 Order I was expecting: 1) Paul 2) Thomson 3) Amoretti 4) Quintal 5) Liang Anyone an idea what could be the reason?
|
|
|
Post by chakra on Apr 15, 2017 7:43:30 GMT 1
Did they arrive at the same time at the first attacking point? First attacking point is on a mountain. They already had a bit of km climbed before reaching the attacking point.
Flat skill in the first part of the race, experience, mood (one can be more content than the other), mountain and sprint skill have decimals, difference in other skills...?
I had some same experience. Nappier ended in the same time as Thomassin in the first stage of Romandië. Both have same flat (0.2 difference), mountain and downhill skill (no difference or very small in that). Both 100% fit. Nappier effort 60% - Thomassin effort 70%. Thomassin ended 13th, Nappier 14th. Nappier has a better TT and sprint, Thomassin better hill. Strange indeed. Nappier is pleased, Thomassin is happy. Did that made the difference? Don't know.
|
|
|
Post by bosko on Apr 20, 2017 10:39:38 GMT 1
Yes, they did arrive all together at the attack point and all attacked together. The attack point is indeed drawn a little bit to the right, but I think that's only to be able to draw it. For the calculation, the attack happens at the beginning of part 2. If you see the skills of my 1st cyclist (Amoretti) and my 4th (Paul), you'll see it cannot have to do with decimals of the skills. The only other skill that could matter is TT, and also there Paul has TT 11, Amoretti 4. They were both "content", Paul has exp 11 and Amoretti exp 1, so also those suggestions can't be the reason. I assume no one can look into the code or something to try to understand this?
|
|
|
Post by Ab Normaal on May 10, 2017 12:34:11 GMT 1
In today's race in 2:2 (Litschau-Griesskirchen) the report says that Bredael takes third place in the 2nd intermediate sprint. 02:01:46 The cyclists of the first group enter part 15 01:59:45 Saltão has very poor downhill experience and falls 01:56:14 Great work by Prevost from Naspa Achne 26, his attack was succesfull ! 01:55:45 Bredael and Defrance both go for third place in this intermediate sprint Bredael is the first to sprint, but can he keep Defrance behind him...!? Bredael has the speed of a rocket in these last meters, he wins 1 point! 01:55:03 The cyclists of the first group enter part 14 5 and 3 points are handed out here between Garcia Del Rio and Portugal, but who'll get what!? Garcia Del Rio is the first to sprint, but can he keep Portugal behind him...!? Oh man, close call, but Portugal wins this sprint and takes the 5 points!
But in the final result, it says that Defrance got 1 point. Sprint 2
1. Portugal 2500 2. Garcia Del Rio 1500 3. Defrance 500
How is that possible? Protest by Defrance because of illegal sprinting?
|
|
|
Post by rarau on May 10, 2017 20:41:38 GMT 1
I think this is a known problem. I think it was disscused before.
it s difficult for me to give you a link because i m on mobile
|
|
|
Post by trapper on May 21, 2017 16:49:55 GMT 1
Berg 3 1. Laforest 2500 2. Daffern 1500 3. Pasoja 500 Berg 4 1. Laforest 2500 2. Daffern 1500 3. Pasoja 500 Sprint 2 1. Daffern 2500 2. Laforest 1500 3. Pasoja 500 2 time 3 in hill and no hill points? ?
|
|
|
Post by bosko on May 22, 2017 7:37:50 GMT 1
Berg 3 1. Laforest 2500 2. Daffern 1500 3. Pasoja 500 Berg 4 1. Laforest 2500 2. Daffern 1500 3. Pasoja 500 Sprint 2 1. Daffern 2500 2. Laforest 1500 3. Pasoja 500 2 time 3 in hill and no hill points? ? I think that's a mistake only in the summary of the sprints. When you read the race report, you see Wallyn takes the 3rd place 2 times (and the points).
|
|
|
Post by dustin on Jun 3, 2017 10:03:54 GMT 1
Not the right topic, but I will mentioned it here, because of the title.
It is possible the races delayed for a while. Because of the peloton-time changed with 9 hours. Although with me.
|
|
|
Post by Ab Normaal on Jun 3, 2017 12:02:53 GMT 1
With everybody. We don't know what caused it an cannot change it.
|
|
|
Post by chakra on Jun 3, 2017 12:02:55 GMT 1
indeed so it is with me. Time changed with 9 hours difference. It is 4 o'clock in the morning. Did I wake up too soon? Race has been simulated.
|
|
|
Post by dustin on Jun 3, 2017 12:41:03 GMT 1
Manual by Schizw!
|
|
|
Post by chakra on Jun 4, 2017 12:11:01 GMT 1
Is the Vattenfall Cyclassics postponed? Perhaps due to the change of the clock the settings has been changed perhaps? Or am I being impatient?
|
|
|
Post by Ab Normaal on Jun 4, 2017 12:13:32 GMT 1
No clue what happenend. Only Schizm and El Gringi can look into it.
|
|
|
Post by chakra on Jun 4, 2017 12:20:11 GMT 1
Thks for the quick answer. Guess we just have to be patient. Probably due to the new server.
|
|