|
Post by ElGringo on Nov 26, 2015 10:21:28 GMT 1
bosko, funraces worked again well yesterday with the right profiles. Even in the funraces seberla "Team Franconia" beats my riders. Masek seems the bif favourite for classics.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Nov 26, 2015 10:26:49 GMT 1
Next week training for a mountain stage The same stage for Elite, U23 and U20 Join the fun. bosko, a nice stage to check Fabbro performance
|
|
|
Post by bosko on Nov 26, 2015 12:31:47 GMT 1
Funraces work correct indeed. Thanx for the solutions. I find it a good way to compare your riders with the riders of other divisions. I joined next weeks race. 0 km flat suits him indeed
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 2, 2015 22:57:21 GMT 1
This week the fun races worked fine. In the U20 Kostich from Melres United won, in U23 Cardinal from PAN won and in the Elite Van Den Hende from Team Franconia won.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 2, 2015 23:00:04 GMT 1
For next week a classic for U20/U23 and Elite
|
|
|
Post by bosko on Dec 3, 2015 10:41:01 GMT 1
This week the fun races worked fine. In the U20 Kostich from Melres United won, in U23 Cardinal from PAN won and in the Elite Van Den Hende from Team Franconia won. I've been watching the race report of Mountain Elite, and I don't understand e few things. I'm just looking at 2 of my riders: Abramian and Fabbro. In part 1 they both attacked and both were succesfull. In part 2 again they attack both, but it's never mentioned if the attack succeeded or not. Actually, when I look at Fabbro, he was about a minute in front of the big group after part 1. After part 2, where he attacked on his best skill, he was suddenly 1 minute behind the big group without a fall or flat tire or nothing. When I watch the riders of the other teams, it seems that a lot of riders attack in the second part, but you find out if they were succesfull or not in the third part. I see for example Abramian attack in part 4 (at 01:01:31). In part 6 I find out his attack failed (at 02:53:51). All a bit strange, no?
|
|
|
Post by maxz on Dec 3, 2015 11:19:08 GMT 1
It looks like fitness is considerated as in normal races, may i ask why? It looks as a nonsense for funraces.and this is maybe the reason most teams did'nt sign in.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 3, 2015 14:19:18 GMT 1
This week the fun races worked fine. In the U20 Kostich from Melres United won, in U23 Cardinal from PAN won and in the Elite Van Den Hende from Team Franconia won. I've been watching the race report of Mountain Elite, and I don't understand e few things. I'm just looking at 2 of my riders: Abramian and Fabbro. In part 1 they both attacked and both were succesfull. In part 2 again they attack both, but it's never mentioned if the attack succeeded or not. Actually, when I look at Fabbro, he was about a minute in front of the big group after part 1. After part 2, where he attacked on his best skill, he was suddenly 1 minute behind the big group without a fall or flat tire or nothing. When I watch the riders of the other teams, it seems that a lot of riders attack in the second part, but you find out if they were succesfull or not in the third part. I see for example Abramian attack in part 4 (at 01:01:31). In part 6 I find out his attack failed (at 02:53:51). All a bit strange, no? I think the majority of managers already saw that. If you attack with 2 riders at the same attacking points consecutive in the 2nd they don't attack, thats why you didn't get a report. That is something we need to fix but for now without a person with skills we need to go on this way.
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 3, 2015 14:20:34 GMT 1
It looks like fitness is considerated as in normal races, may i ask why? It looks as a nonsense for funraces.and this is maybe the reason most teams did'nt sign in. The riders don't use fitness in funraces and they start all at 100%
|
|
|
Post by maxz on Dec 4, 2015 10:18:05 GMT 1
It looks like fitness is considerated as in normal races, may i ask why? It looks as a nonsense for funraces.and this is maybe the reason most teams did'nt sign in. The riders don't use fitness in funraces and they start all at 100% no man, u can clearly see in the last elite Granato (65%) lost 10' from Christmann (100%) who was his helper... that's impossible unless the fit counts, i assure you there is a big difference in mountain skill between them, over 4 points in favour of Granato, also Colombo (75%) finished behind with a similar skillset. this is only because starting fitness, my tactics was setted as they all start with 100% but they weren't. I can remember this changed with the peloton v2 and was the reason i didnt subscrive to funrace anymore. also in the U20 i noticed similar ciclysts had big difference in results due to different starting fit.
|
|
|
Post by maxz on Dec 4, 2015 10:22:59 GMT 1
I've been watching the race report of Mountain Elite, and I don't understand e few things. I'm just looking at 2 of my riders: Abramian and Fabbro. In part 1 they both attacked and both were succesfull. In part 2 again they attack both, but it's never mentioned if the attack succeeded or not. Actually, when I look at Fabbro, he was about a minute in front of the big group after part 1. After part 2, where he attacked on his best skill, he was suddenly 1 minute behind the big group without a fall or flat tire or nothing. When I watch the riders of the other teams, it seems that a lot of riders attack in the second part, but you find out if they were succesfull or not in the third part. I see for example Abramian attack in part 4 (at 01:01:31). In part 6 I find out his attack failed (at 02:53:51). All a bit strange, no? I think the majority of managers already saw that. If you attack with 2 riders at the same attacking points consecutive in the 2nd they don't attack, thats why you didn't get a report. That is something we need to fix but for now without a person with skills we need to go on this way. whoa i didn't noticed this before, well, i knew there was something strange but never heard this "officially"... mmm ok now i can understand why some races seemed messed up to me... lol from now i'll arrange my tctcs in a different way for sure... ^_^
|
|
|
Post by tossboom on Dec 4, 2015 12:31:56 GMT 1
I hope this is only in funraces, not in normal races?
|
|
|
Post by maxz on Dec 4, 2015 15:27:28 GMT 1
I hope this is only in funraces, not in normal races? mmm i'm not sure...
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 4, 2015 17:26:14 GMT 1
The riders don't use fitness in funraces and they start all at 100% no man, u can clearly see in the last elite Granato (65%) lost 10' from Christmann (100%) who was his helper... that's impossible unless the fit counts, i assure you there is a big difference in mountain skill between them, over 4 points in favour of Granato, also Colombo (75%) finished behind with a similar skillset. this is only because starting fitness, my tactics was setted as they all start with 100% but they weren't. I can remember this changed with the peloton v2 and was the reason i didnt subscrive to funrace anymore. also in the U20 i noticed similar ciclysts had big difference in results due to different starting fit. Max I will check that. I notice also that the gaps were to big. Nikeboy told me that he would put in fun races that all rider start with 100% fitness
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Dec 4, 2015 17:29:50 GMT 1
I hope this is only in funraces, not in normal races? Happens in normal races unfortunately when 2 riders attack in the first two attacking points.
|
|