|
Post by ElGringo on Mar 4, 2012 12:19:42 GMT 1
Another issue with the tool: If the profile goes too low under the starting point the blue line vanishes - there seems to be some normalisation regarding heights. Can you reproduce this behaviour regarding depths? Same here. But if you at the end of the stage put a mountain the correct profile will appear
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 4, 2012 12:23:39 GMT 1
Another small issue : if a attackpoint and a sprint or mountainsprint are at the same point only the attacckpoint is visisble.
|
|
|
Post by bj on Mar 4, 2012 12:57:10 GMT 1
done with all of my races
i will also do
59 Tour du Limousin [image] France 2.HC
if noone else has it yet?!
|
|
|
Post by JoeLag on Mar 4, 2012 15:57:56 GMT 1
I'm finished with my races. I apply now for: - 98 - Tour du Finistére - nikeboy, it's Finistére
- 108 - Giro della Toscana
- 114 - Sparkassen "neuseenclassics-rund um die braunkohle"
- 127 - ProRace Berlin
- 437 - Tour de Serbie
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 6, 2012 11:32:11 GMT 1
next I would like the Tour de San Luis (182)
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Mar 6, 2012 21:13:12 GMT 1
I will send my profiles asap. A sneak preview to the Giro tells that in my proposal the total amount of flat-hill-mountain-downhill kilometres remain the same as in v1. Also a TTT will still be the start of the Giro, but new will be that it will end with a mountain ITT in the last stage. Excitement garanteed! Flat-trainers will get an extra flat stage in return. But this all only if my proposal gets approved ofc.
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 7, 2012 10:06:50 GMT 1
next for me is 435 Vuelta a Colombia (if availabale)
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Mar 7, 2012 10:53:55 GMT 1
I already made all that I propose. I made it all and follow a rule of putting in maximum 5/6 attacking points for mountain stages and 3/5 to the other stages.
I put also atacking 1 or 2 attacking points on the TT when the terrain makes a diference in hill or mountain.
Nikeboy do you want me to send it all to you?
Tomorow I will propose for some more to make.
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Mar 7, 2012 14:28:51 GMT 1
Try to put a minum of 5 and maximum of 12 attackpoints per race.
Finished races can be mailed to pelotongame@gmail.com
|
|
|
Post by lee1950 on Mar 8, 2012 4:57:59 GMT 1
I have not been adding Attackpoints to time trial stages. Should I be?
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Mar 8, 2012 6:49:40 GMT 1
No, attackpoints in ITT/TTT are not needed
|
|
|
Post by Schizm on Mar 8, 2012 8:48:12 GMT 1
No, attackpoints in ITT/TTT are not needed So ITT and TTT will have absolutely no tactics in them ?
|
|
|
Post by JoeLag on Mar 8, 2012 9:08:18 GMT 1
No, attackpoints in ITT/TTT are not needed So ITT and TTT will have absolutely no tactics in them ? I see that sprinter, helper and attacks would be of no use in time trials. Will the save fitness option be considered for time trials? BTW: What's the effect of save fitness? I can test in the funraces how much slower a cyclist rides ... but I don't know how much energy is saved.
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Mar 8, 2012 11:59:17 GMT 1
Yes, Save Fitness (as it is officially called ) can be used in ITT/TTT. With this tactic, your cyclist will loose only 1% fitness iso the usual 5%
|
|
|
Post by JoeLag on Mar 8, 2012 13:30:55 GMT 1
Yes, Save Fitness (as it is officially called ) ... Yeah. I have been pondering for about 3 hours if it would be faster to check the settings for funraces myself or to wait until nikeboy corrects my sloppy usage of the expression save energy.
|
|