|
|
Post by Quatannens on Jul 17, 2008 18:14:51 GMT 1
I think the transfervalues are worth nothing right now, the primary skills have way to less impact on the transfervalue. If you have a cyclist with 20 steering and 20 balance, he's transfervalue will be high. Even if his primary skills are 0-0-0-0-0-0. So please do something about this, it should be something like this: Most important: Flat, hill, mountain, downhill, sprint and TT (maybe some things with a small difference) Second thing: Bravery Thirth: Steering I don't know what to do with expierience and leadership. Than the age shoud do the transfervalue * something, how older how les the factor. And if this is ok, the wages should become more realistic. Now, a cyclist with very very good skills even don't want 10000. Is this normal? No I don't think so  Last but not least, the difference between divisions still is way to small. The best cyclists should ride in first, just because it are the only teams who can pay the cyclists wage... If it isn't good, you now what I want to change and there can be other better ideas. |
|
|
|
Post by gelies on Jul 21, 2008 8:44:46 GMT 1
for the second part, let's wait that all the best cyclist will end their contract....
speaking for myself i know I will have some problem in handling the big wages that they will pretend.
for the first part, doesn't really bother me. the tv is only a marginal thing in the game
|
|
switten
Cycling Tourist Group
Posts: 11
|
Post by switten on Jul 21, 2008 14:59:47 GMT 1
The transfer value really bothers me, it is not right like Quatannens said. This has to be like in Hattrick: Total skill index! The TV has to change!  |
|
|
|
Post by gladharim on Jul 21, 2008 17:52:24 GMT 1
No it does not....Riders who proove sometng will get a higher wage, highs skills dont mean high wages, CA, FA are way to important to justify a link between flat/mountain skill and wage.
In the real world a cyclist is only worth as much as his victories, no matter how good his so called skills might be.
Its the same in Peleton. If you have a lot of riders winning a lot the will ask 25k a week.... multiply this by 10-20? Who would be able to afford that? You could count those teams on your fingers...
What shoud be changed is the wage reset after one sells a rider to 2K...
|
|
|
|
Post by kwyjibo88 on Sept 4, 2008 14:15:29 GMT 1
I noticed the wage they get after a transfer is TV/1000 or something like it.
I think primary skills should have more impact on TV and by that I mean a whole lot more so if you transfer a cyclist with like 10 on mountain and 10 on flat he should cost more than 10k a week and not like now when he costs little more than a cyclist with 5 5 on these skills.
But I think you should realise that when this is the case people in higher levels should even get more money since their wagecost would become alot higher.
With these higher wages it shouldnt be much of a problem to give guys you train a new contract with higer wages since if you want to buy a similar guy you will pay a similar salary. Not like now when buying a player is way too cheap concerning wages.
|
|
vasa
U23 Developm. Team
Posts: 64 
|
Post by vasa on Sept 7, 2008 8:42:07 GMT 1
A really bad idea. The wages are fine as they are. Good riders who are at the end of their contract ask a lot more than the default Transfervalue/100. You can obviously chip away at that with bonusses for winning certaing things. And that's the most realistic way to deal with it.
Pay him when he actually is able to translate his skills in a victory.
|
|
|
|
Post by philipoes on Sept 7, 2008 13:31:02 GMT 1
It is true that the transfervalue looks a bit off, Quatannes' idea on that looks quite good.
However, I don't really see a problem in the wages at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by kwyjibo88 on Sept 7, 2008 16:52:34 GMT 1
A really bad idea. The wages are fine as they are. Good riders who are at the end of their contract ask a lot more than the default Transfervalue/100. You can obviously chip away at that with bonusses for winning certaing things. And that's the most realistic way to deal with it. Pay him when he actually is able to translate his skills in a victory. This is indeed realistic but it isnt realistic that a cyclist being really good (TV of 400k +) just earning 4k+ a week which they do after a transfer. This isnt normal. They should earn way more from the beginning. They are way more usefull than useless cyclists with 2k a week. So they should earn way more. Now they encourage to transfer him at the end of a contract and buy new (also succesfull cyclists). You can just lower the wage by selling one guy and buying a new one. Thats not normal good cyclists should earn much and much more than bad ones. |
|
|
|
Post by NikeBoy on Sept 7, 2008 19:43:42 GMT 1
The thing is that when you transfer a cyclist, his mood resets to content and he requests the wage at a content level.
When he is in your team and he is ver happy, he requests the wage at "very happy" level which is much much more.
|
|
|
|
Post by kwyjibo88 on Sept 18, 2008 19:11:13 GMT 1
When someone is happy somewhere he would request less money. Thats pretty normal I think.
I think the contribution of the prime skills should double. One skill higher -> 20k more TV instead of 10k.
|
|
robdop
Amateur Team
Posts: 105
|
Post by robdop on Sept 25, 2008 17:34:34 GMT 1
i think the tv must change.
and i think that cyclists also mus'nt be available 20% under/over there transfervalue.
because if you are a low team you can buy a lot of players(which are good for you)
but im now a division 2 team with 6 million, and i cant buy any player who's better then my own players and ive bought them all for less then 3 million.
its far to difficult for me to buy a good cyclist, and because i cant get better cyclists the only way i can promote is that my opponents getting worse but that doesnt happen, they're getting better:)
|
|
