|
Post by Genomico on Sept 20, 2012 7:20:11 GMT 1
I've been doing some scripting to get results from all divisions. Because the first group of a stage is often very large, it doesn't make much sense to make an individual top 100 for each stage (I'll do that for the general rankings of a tour). But I have a division top 20 by taking the fastest time of each division. Mantes-La-Jolie - Orléans (Paris-Nice 1st stage)Brive-la-Gaillarde - Rodez (Paris-Nice 2nd stage)Civitavecchia - Marsciano (Tirreno-Adriatico 1st stage)
|
|
|
Post by JoeLag on Sept 20, 2012 8:44:59 GMT 1
Great work! Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Sept 20, 2012 8:59:09 GMT 1
Nice stats. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Zberg on Sept 20, 2012 9:48:59 GMT 1
Thanks, Genomico!
|
|
|
Post by ElGringo on Sept 20, 2012 9:57:38 GMT 1
Watching your stats we could see that Div 3 has got better results then Div 2, and I'm surprised to see some teams from Div4.
Now the time is based in the overall riders and not 1 rider that riders at 100%.
|
|
roller
Amateur Team
Posts: 123
|
Post by roller on Sept 20, 2012 10:06:22 GMT 1
Thank you very much. Nice Stats. Great idea picking up only the winner of each division. I think that the teams of division 2 are more focused on montain terrain and with the first mountain stage they may get better results.
Is the calendar the same for each division? IP has announced that calendar may be different from division to division.
|
|
|
Post by driewielerken on Sept 20, 2012 10:46:26 GMT 1
Thank you very much. Nice Stats. Great idea picking up only the winner of each division. I think that the teams of division 2 are more focused on montain terrain and with the first mountain stage they may get better results. Is the calendar the same for each division? IP has announced that calendar may be different from division to division. This season we all have the same calendar
|
|
|
Post by Bostrol on Sept 20, 2012 10:53:21 GMT 1
I agree with roller: the teams who got promotion to division 2 are mostly mountain teams: with the old calendar it was much easier to promote with a mountain trainer. I hope (and believe) the new calendar will get more balance in this. On top of that there were many teams (like mine) anticipating on the new race engine by training sprint or tt. That costed them many points in last season, but gets them great results now.
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 21, 2012 3:12:07 GMT 1
Suze-la-Rousse - Sisteron (Paris-Nice 3rd stage)
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 21, 2012 3:28:47 GMT 1
If we would give the #1 division 20 points, the #2 19 until 1 point for #20, we get the following division ranking: Rank | Div. | Points | 1 | Div. 3:16 | 57 | 2 | Div. 3:6 | 56 | 3 | Div. 3:11 | 54 | 4 | Div. 3:1 | 51 | 5 | Div. 2:3 | 50 | 6 | Div. 3:14 | 49 | 7 | Div. 3:15 | 48 | 8 | Div. 3:10 | 48 | 9 | Div. 2:4 | 41 | 10 | Div. 3:13 | 38 | 11 | Div. 2:2 | 37 | 12 | Div. 3:3 | 36 | 13 | Div. 2:1 | 33 | 14 | Div. 4:17 | 32 | 15 | Div. 3:8 | 31 | 16 | Div. 3:5 | 31 | 17 | Div. 3:7 | 27 | 18 | Div. 3:9 | 19 | 19 | Div. 3:12 | 15 | 20 | Div. 4:55 | 14 |
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 21, 2012 4:18:23 GMT 1
I don't have a script yet that makes an individual ranking of the general standing of Paris-Nice, but if we look at the best times of each division, then we have the following ranking: Paris-Nice end ranking
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 22, 2012 13:27:31 GMT 1
Civitanova Marche - San Benedetto del Tronto (Tirreno-Adriatico 1st stage)
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 22, 2012 19:35:05 GMT 1
San Gemini - Chieti (Tirreno-Adriatico 3rd stage)Tirreno-Adriatico end ranking
|
|
|
Post by Genomico on Sept 23, 2012 23:16:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by joachim1107 on Sept 24, 2012 12:49:27 GMT 1
Thks for the statistics
|
|